4.8 Review

Activated PI3 Kinase Delta Syndrome: From Genetics to Therapy

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00369

关键词

activated PI3 kinase delta syndrome; primary immunodeficiency; phosphoinositide-3-kinase delta; mutation; inhibitor

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [095198/Z/10/Z]
  2. UK Medical Research Council - GSK [MR/M012328/1]
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre
  4. MRC [MR/M012328/1, MR/M012328/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Wellcome Trust [095198/Z/10/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/M012328/2, MR/M012328/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activated PI3 kinase delta syndrome (APDS) is a primary immunodeficiency caused by dominant mutations that increase activity of phosphoinositide-3-kinase delta (PI3K delta). APDS can be caused by mutations in the PIK3CD gene that encodes PI3K delta catalytic subunit p110 delta (APDS1) or mutations in the PIK3R1 gene that encodes regulatory subunit p85 alpha (APDS2). APDS research advanced rapidly after the initial discovery in 2013. More than 200 APDS patients have been identified around the world. Multiple novel APDS mutations were reported and molecular mechanisms leading to PI3K delta activation have been elucidated. The finding of APDS significantly increased our understanding of the role of PI3K delta in the human immune system. Perhaps most importantly, discovery of the molecular basis of this primary immunodeficiency suggested that APDS patients, who previously received only non-specific therapy, could be treated by a novel class of drugs that inhibits PI3K delta activity. This led to the ongoing clinical trials of selective PI3K delta inhibitors in APDS patients. Overall, the APDS story provides an excellent example of translational research, beginning with patients who had an unknown disease cause and leading to a novel specific knowledge-based treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据