4.8 Review

Animal Models to Study Hepatitis C virus infection

期刊

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01032

关键词

hepatitis C virus; animal models; humanized mice; homologs; vaccine; antiviral therapy

资金

  1. Special Research Fund of Ghent
  2. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen)
  3. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT SBO project HLIM-3D)
  4. Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO) [IUAP P7/47-HEPRO-2]
  5. European Union (HepaMab)
  6. Research Foundation-Flanders
  7. Special Research Fund of Ghent University
  8. Egyptian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With more than 71 million chronically infected people, the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major global health concern. Although new direct acting antivirals have significantly improved the rate of HCV cure, high therapy cost, potential emergence of drug-resistant viral variants, and unavailability of a protective vaccine represent challenges for complete HCV eradication. Relevant animal models are required, and additional development remains necessary, to effectively study HCV biology, virus-host interactions and for the evaluation of new antiviral approaches and prophylactic vaccines. The chimpanzee, the only non-human primate susceptible to experimental HCV infection, has been used extensively to study HCV infection, particularly to analyze the innate and adaptive immune response upon infection. However, financial, practical, and especially ethical constraints have urged the exploration of alternative small animal models. These include different types of transgenic mice, immunodeficient mice of which the liver is engrafted with human hepatocytes (humanized mice) and, more recently, immunocompetent rodents that are susceptible to infection with viruses that are closely related to HCV. In this review, we provide an overview of the currently available animal models that have proven valuable for the study of HCV, and discuss their main benefits and weaknesses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据