4.7 Article

Antecedent and Post-Application Rain Events Trigger Glyphosate Transport from Runoff-Prone Soils

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00085

关键词

-

资金

  1. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation [C008211]
  2. Cornell University's David R. Atkinson Center for a Sustainable Future Academic Venture Fund [2015-AVF-Richards]
  3. USDA-NIFA Sustainable Bioenergy Grant [2011-67009-20083]
  4. Toxic Substances Hydrology Program
  5. NIFA [2011-67009-20083, 579859] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent environmental surveys report widespread detections of the herbicide glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] in surface waters, despite its strong immobilization and rapid biodegradation in soils. We performed four high-frequency sampling campaigns (from 2015 to 2017) following controlled spray applications on an experimental perennial grass field site with wetness-prone marginal soils. We monitored dissolved glyphosate concentrations in the outflow (runoff and shallow drainage) using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Rainfall-triggered outflow events occurred between 3 and 13 days following spray application. Outflow concentrations varied widely from nondetectable levels to 90 mu g L-1, peaking during the first significant outflow event in each campaign and diminishing as flows subsided. Subsequent outflow peaks caused concentrations to increase again but to a lesser extent. Cumulative mass efflux in outflow across the different campaigns ranged from 0.06 to 1.0% of applied glyphosate. Cumulative glyphosate losses in the outflow were not during the postspray sampling period, but rather with soil hydrologic conditions at the time of spraying as reflected by the 7 day cumulative prespray rainfall, with wetter antecedent conditions favoring greater cumulative mobilization. Avoiding spraying under such conditions may mitigate potential glyphosate mobilization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据