4.7 Article

Assessment and valuation of recreational ecosystem services of landscapes

期刊

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
卷 31, 期 -, 页码 289-295

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.04.011

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB) [3513 83 0300]
  2. German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) [01UU1601A]
  3. project ESMERALDA from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [642007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recreational ecosystem services (RES), understood as the numerous benefits people obtain from landscapes and the natural environment, are a topical area of policy, research and society. This Editorial introduces the current state of RES research, provides an overview of the 21 contributions comprising this Special Issue of Ecosystem Services, and outlines opportunities for further research. This issue's publications employ diverse methods for assessing and valuing RES at different scales in Europe and beyond. The papers present advancements in mapping and valuation, provide evidence for the contributions of biodiversity and landscapes to the generation of RES and human well-being, and shed light on distributional effects across different beneficiaries. Taken together, contributions emphasize that RES may be a prime vehicle for reconnecting people with nature with positive effects on societal well-being. The diversity of approaches currently applied in RES research reflects much creativity and new insights, for example by harnessing georeferenced social media data. Future research should aim towards harmonizing datasets and methods to enhance comparability without compromising the need for context-specific adaptations. Finally, more research is needed on options for integrating RES information in decision making, planning and management in order to enhance actual uptake in public and private decisions. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据