4.7 Article

Bigger, more diverse and better? Mapping structural diversity and its recreational value in urban green spaces

期刊

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES
卷 31, 期 -, 页码 502-516

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.013

关键词

Urban green spaces; Structural diversity; Recreation; Cultural ecosystem services; Size

资金

  1. Iceland, through the EEA Financial Mechanism
  2. Liechtenstein through the EEA Financial Mechanism
  3. Norway through the EEA Financial Mechanism
  4. URBAN FP7 Science in Society project in the Strategic Institute (FP7 Science in Society) programme of the Norwegian Ministry of Climate and Environment
  5. Research Council of Norway [160022/F40]
  6. OpenNESS project (Operationalisation of Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services: From Concepts to Real-world Applications), European Union Seventh Framework Programme [FP7-ENV.2012.6.2-1, 308428]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Are bigger green spaces more diverse in terms of their natural and manmade elements? Does higher diversity mean they are more attractive to users and encourage more diversity of activities, and thereby provide a wider range of recreational ecosystem services? We assessed and classified the recreational services in green urban spaces in the city of Oslo, by combining multidimensional biophysical mapping based on the structural diversity index (SDI), with users' importance scores as an approach to nonmonetary valuation of urban parks. Our results reveal that size is a weak and non-linear determinant of structural diversity. On the other hand, stated preferences are correlated with structural elements. Urban green spaces classification could be improved by combining structural diversity indicators with structural preference studies. At the same time, our structural diversity measure did not cover the full range of recreational services across the spectrum of urban green spaces. We discuss potential extensions of the structural diversity index for urban green space in order to cover a wider range of green spaces from cemetaries to peri-urban forest - and the recreational opportunities provided by them. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据