4.7 Article

Biogeophysical Impacts of Land-Use Change on Climate Extremes in Low-Emission Scenarios: Results From HAPPI-Land

期刊

EARTHS FUTURE
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 396-409

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017EF000744

关键词

HAPPI-Land; land-use change; land-based mitigation; Shared Socioeconomic Pathways; Earth System Modeling; Integrated Assessment Modeling-

资金

  1. NERC fellowship [NE/N014057/1]
  2. Integrated Research Program for Advancing Climate Models (TOUGOU program) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan
  3. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme through the project ERC DROUGHT-HEAT (European Research Council) [FP7-IDEAS-ERC-617518]
  5. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme through the project LUC4C [603542]
  6. European Community's Seventh Framework Programme through the project CRESCENDO [641816]
  7. NERC [NE/N014057/1, NE/R009554/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impacts of land use have been shown to have considerable influence on regional climate. With the recent international commitment to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees C, emission reductions need to be ambitious and could involve major land-use change (LUC). Land-based mitigation efforts to curb emissions growth include increasing terrestrial carbon sequestration through reforestation, or the adoption of bioenergy crops. These activities influence local climate through biogeophysical feedbacks, however, it is uncertain how important they are for a 1.5 degrees climate target. This was the motivation for HAPPI-Land: the half a degree additional warming, prognosis, and projected impactsland-use scenario experiment. Using four Earth system models, we present the first multimodel results from HAPPI-Land and demonstrate the critical role of land use for understanding the characteristics of regional climate extremes in low-emission scenarios. In particular, our results show that changes in temperature extremes due to LUC are comparable in magnitude to changes arising from half a degree of global warming. We also demonstrate that LUC contributes to more than 20% of the change in temperature extremes for large land areas concentrated over the Northern Hemisphere. However, we also identify sources of uncertainty that influence the multimodel consensus of our results including how LUC is implemented and the corresponding biogeophysical feedbacks that perturb climate. Therefore, our results highlight the urgent need to resolve the challenges in implementing LUC across models to quantify the impacts and consider how LUC contributes to regional changes in extremes associated with sustainable development pathways. Plain Language Summary The motivation for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report of 1.5 degrees C stems from the need to understand how the impacts of climate change may evolve for half a degree of global warming. Most low-emission scenarios involve substantial land-use change (LUC) including the expansion of bioenergy and food crops, as well as afforestation. Future emission scenarios used as input to climate models are derived using integrated assessment models, and focus on greenhouse gas emissions. However, changes in land use also have a direct effect on local climate through the local water and energy balances, which is not considered in these models, and therefore, our understanding on how dependent these climate projections are to the choice of land-use scenario is limited. Our study demonstrates that the land-use scenario has a considerable influence on the projections of temperature extremes for low-emission scenarios. In particular, for large land areas in the Northern Hemisphere, more than 20% of the change in temperature extremes can be attributed to LUC. However, our study also reveals that considerable uncertainty remains on what the feedbacks of land use may mean for land-based mitigation activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据