4.5 Article

Photometric content and validation

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 616, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832756

关键词

catalogs; surveys; instrumentation: photometers; techniques: photometric; galaxies: general

资金

  1. Gaia MultiLateral Agreement (MLA)
  2. United Kingdom Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
  3. United Kingdom Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) [ST/L006553/1]
  4. United Kingdom Space Agency (UKSA) [ST/N000641/1]
  5. MINECO (Spanish Ministry of Economy) (MINECO/FEDER, UE) [ESP2016-80079-C2-1-R, ESP2014-55996-C2-1-R]
  6. ICCUB (Unidad de Excelencia Maria de Maeztu) [MDM-2014-0369]
  7. Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI) [I/037/08/0, I/058/10/0, 2014-025-R.0, 2014-025-R.1.2015, I/008/10/0, 2013/030/I.0]
  8. Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica (INAF)
  9. Robert Martin Ayers Sciences Fund
  10. STFC [ST/F007620/1, ST/N000757/1, ST/E502480/1, ST/L006553/1, ST/H001972/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims. We describe the photometric content of the second data release of the Gaia project (Gaia DR2) and its validation along with the quality of the data. Methods. The validation was mainly carried out using an internal analysis of the photometry. External comparisons were also made, but were limited by the precision and systematics that may be present in the external catalogues used. Results. In addition to the photometric quality assessment, we present the best estimates of the three photometric passbands. Various colour-colour transformations are also derived to enable the users to convert between the Gaia and commonly used passbands. Conclusions. The internal analysis of the data shows that the photometric calibrations can reach a precision as low as 2 mmag on individual CCD measurements. Other tests show that systematic effects are present in the data at the 10 mmag level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据