4.6 Article

Role of the Urokinase-Fibrinolytic System in Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition during Lung Injury

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 185, 期 1, 页码 55-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.08.027

关键词

-

资金

  1. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute Clinical Innovator Award [FAMRI-ID-082380]
  2. American Heart Association [GRNT19020001]
  3. NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [HL093547]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alveolar type II epithelial (ATE) cell injury precedes development of pulmonary fibrosis. Mice lacking urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) are highly susceptible, whereas those deficient in plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) are resistant to lung injury and pulmonary fibrosis. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been considered, at Least in part, as a source of myofibroblast formation during fibrogenesis. However, the contribution of altered expression of major components of the uPA system on ATII cell EMT during lung injury is not well understood. To investigate whether changes in uPA and PAI-1 by ATII cells contribute to EMT, ATII cells from patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and mice with bleomycin-, transforming growth factor beta-, or passive cigarette smoke-induced Lung injury were analyzed for uPA, PAI-1, and EMT markers. We found reduced expression of E-cadherin and zona occludens-1, whereas collagen-I and alpha-smooth muscle actin were increased in ATII cells isolated from injured lungs. These changes were associated with a parallel increase in PAI-1 and reduced uPA expression. Further, inhibition of Src kinase activity using caveotin-1 scaffolding domain peptide suppressed bleomycin-, transforming growth factor beta-, or passive cigarette smoke induced EMT and restored uPA expression while suppressing PAI-1. These studies show that induction of PAI-1 and inhibition of uPA during fibrosing lung injury lead to EMT in ATII cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据