4.6 Article

Feasibility of Using Graphene Oxide Nanoflake (GONF) as Additive of Cement Composite

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app8030419

关键词

ball-milled graphene oxide; cement hydrates; petrographic analysis; dry-mix design

资金

  1. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement grant - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport [17CTAP-C129720-01]
  2. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) [129720] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The object of this study is to investigate the feasibility of ball-milled graphene oxide nanoflakes (GONFs) produced by a mechanochemical process as an additive in Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC)-based paste and concrete. Different percentages of GONFs (0.01-1 wt. %) were added in OPC paste mix to find the optimum content of GONF in GONF-combined cement composites. To investigate the effect of the changes in the mix design on OPC paste, two mix design methods were employed: (1) Dry-mix, where GONFs and OPC powders are mixed prior to paste formation and (2) Wet-mix, where sonicated GONFs solution is used as the pour water with OPC paste mix. Data from mechanical tests (compressive and flexural tests) showed that OPC paste incorporating 0.05% GONF resulted in the highest strength for OPC paste. The results of strength tests indicated that Dry-mix is competitive as compared with Wet-mix. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) was used to identify GONFs inside products of cement hydration. To explore the practicality of using GONF in concrete, concrete specimens were made, cured and tested with different percentages of dry-mixed GONFs (0.01-0.1 wt. %). The result of strength test showed that GONF improves the compressive and flexural strengths of concrete around 15% with 0.01 wt. % GONF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据