4.7 Article

Single crystalline electronic structure and growth mechanism of aligned square graphene sheets

期刊

APL MATERIALS
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.5012947

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC (UK) [EP/K04074X/1]
  2. DARPA (USA) MESO Project [N66001-11-1-4105]
  3. Bureau of Frontier Sciences and Education, Chinese Academy of Sciences
  4. China Scholarship Council-University of Oxford
  5. Indonesia Endowment Fund for Education (Lembaga Pengelolaan Dana Pendidikan, LPDP)
  6. Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, commercially available copper foil has become an efficient and inexpensive catalytic substrate for scalable growth of large-area graphene films for fundamental research and applications. Interestingly, despite its hexagonal honeycomb lattice, graphene can be grown into large aligned square-shaped sheets on copper foils. Here, by applying angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy with submicron spatial resolution (micro-ARPES) to study the three-dimensional electronic structures of square graphene sheets grown on copper foils, we verified the high quality of individual square graphene sheets as well as their merged regions (with aligned orientation). Furthermore, by simultaneously measuring the graphene sheets and their substrate copper foil, we not only established the (001) copper surface structure but also discovered that the square graphene sheets' sides align with the < 110 > copper direction, suggesting an important role of copper substrate in the growth of square graphene sheets-which will help the development of effective methods to synthesize high-quality large-size regularly shaped graphene sheets for future applications. This work also demonstrates the effectiveness of micro-ARPES in exploring low-dimensional materials down to atomic thickness and sub-micron lateral size (e.g., besides graphene, it can also be applied to transition metal dichalcogenides and various van derWaals heterostructures) (c) 2018 Author(s).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据