4.8 Article

Probing Quantum Confinement and Electronic Structure at Polar Oxide Interfaces

期刊

ADVANCED SCIENCE
卷 5, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/advs.201800242

关键词

2D superconductivity; electronic structure; oxide interfaces; polar discontinuity; quantum confinement

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation - division II
  2. European Research Council under the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC [319286]
  3. Walloon Region [1117545]
  4. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique (F.R.S.-FNRS) [2.5020.11]
  5. F.R.S.-FNRS PDR project [HiT-4FiT]
  6. ARC project AIMED

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polar discontinuities occurring at interfaces between two materials constitute both a challenge and an opportunity in the study and application of a variety of devices. In order to cure the large electric field occurring in such structures, a reconfiguration of the charge landscape sets in at the interface via chemical modifications, adsorbates, or charge transfer. In the latter case, one may expect a local electronic doping of one material: one example is the two-dimensional electron liquid (2DEL) appearing in SrTiO3 once covered by a polar LaAlO3 layer. Here, it is shown that tuning the formal polarization of a (La,Al)(1-x)(Sr,Ti)(x)O-3 (LASTO:x) overlayer modifies the quantum confinement of the 2DEL in SrTiO3 and its electronic band structure. The analysis of the behavior in magnetic field of superconducting field-effect devices reveals, in agreement with ab initio calculations and self-consistent Poisson-Schrodinger modeling, that quantum confinement and energy splitting between electronic bands of different symmetries strongly depend on the interface total charge densities. These results strongly support the polar discontinuity mechanisms with a full charge transfer to explain the origin of the 2DEL at the celebrated LaAlO3/SrTiO3 interface and demonstrate an effective tool for tailoring the electronic structure at oxide interfaces.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据