3.8 Article

Customizing the Shape and Microenvironment Biochemistry of Biocompatible Macroscopic Plant-Derived Cellulose Scaffolds

期刊

ACS BIOMATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING
卷 4, 期 11, 页码 3726-3736

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00178

关键词

biomaterials; cellulose; plants; scaffolds; biocompatibility; angiogenesis

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant
  2. NSERC postgraduate scholarship
  3. Ontario Graduate Scholarship (OGS)
  4. Fonds de Recherche du Quebec -Sante (FRQS)
  5. Canada Research Chairs (CRC) program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant-derived cellulose scaffolds constitute a highly viable and interesting biomaterial. They retain a high flexibility in shape and structure, present the ability to tune surface biochemistry, display a high degree of biocompatibility, exhibit vascularization, and are widely available and easily produced. What is also immediately clear is that pre-existing cellulose structures in plants can also provide candidates for specific tissue engineering applications. Here, we report a new preparation and fabrication approach for producing large scale scaffolds with customizable macroscopic structures that support cell attachment and invasion both in vitro and in vivo. This new fabrication method significantly improves cell attachment compared to that in our previous work. Moreover, the materials remain highly biocompatible and retain vascularization properties in vivo. We present proof-of-concept studies that demonstrate how hydrogels can be temporarily or permanently cast onto the macroscopic scaffolds to create composite plant-derived cellulose biomaterials. This inverse molding approach allows us to provide temporary or permanent biochemical cues to invading cells in vitro. The development of a new-generation of rapidly and efficiently produced composite plant-derived biomaterials provides an important proof that such biomaterials have the potential for numerous applications in tissue engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据