4.6 Review

The Computational 2D Materials Database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals

期刊

2D MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/aacfc1

关键词

ab initio calculations; opto-electronic properties; database; materials discovery; materials design; 2D materials; many-body perturbation theory

资金

  1. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF103]
  2. European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [676580]
  3. Novel Materials Discovery (NOMAD) Laboratory, a European Center of Excellence
  4. VILLUM FONDEN [9455]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [773122]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce the Computational 2D Materials Database (C2DB), which organises a variety of structural, thermodynamic, elastic, electronic, magnetic, and optical properties of around 1500 two-dimensional materials distributed over more than 30 different crystal structures. Material properties are systematically calculated by state-of-the-art density functional theory and many-body perturbation theory (G(0)W(0) and the Bethe-Salpeter equation for similar to 250 materials) following a semi-automated workflow for maximal consistency and transparency. The C2DB is fully open and can be browsed online (http://c2db.fysik.dtu.dk) or downloaded in its entirety. In this paper, we describe the workflow behind the database, present an overview of the properties and materials currently available, and explore trends and correlations in the data. Moreover, we identify a large number of new potentially synthesisable 2D materials with interesting properties targeting applications within spintronics, (opto-) electronics, and plasmonics. The C2DB offers a comprehensive and easily accessible overview of the rapidly expanding family of 2D materials and forms an ideal platform for computational modeling and design of new 2D materials and van der Waals heterostructures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据