4.6 Article

Improved quality of life and joint functions in patients with knee rheumatoid arthritis who underwent five portal arthroscopic synovectomy

期刊

PEERJ
卷 6, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4727

关键词

Rheumatoid arthritis; Synovectomy; Negative pressure drainage; Arthroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of the knee who underwent five portal arthroscopic synovectomy, with or without post-operative negative pressure drainage (NPD). Material and Methods: A prospective clinical trial was performed. Patients with class I, II, and III RA of the knee were enrolled. They underwent five portal arthroscopic synovectomy. Post-operatively, they received either NPD (group A) or non-NPD (group B). Health assessment questionnaire (HAQ), disease activity score 28 (DAS 28), and Lysholm knee joint score were evaluated before the operations, and at six weeks, three months, and one year after the operations. Results: A total of 36 patients were enrolled into the study, with 63.9% (23) female patients and mean age of 47.2 years old. All of the patients had clinical symptoms (joint swelling, pain, and dysfunction) for at least six months with poor responses to the traditional pharmaceutical therapy. There were 12, 16, and eight patients in class I, II, and III RA groups, respectively (six IA, six IB, eight IIA, eight IIB, four IIIA, and four IIIB). One year after the operation, patients had statistically significant improvements on HAQ, DAS 28, and Lysholm knee joint scores. More improvements were observed in patients with class I diseases. There were no statistically significant differences between group A and B. Conclusion: Five portal arthroscopic synovectomy could increase the quality of life, decrease disease activities, and improve joint functions in patients with RA. More benefits were observed in patients with early disease developments. Patients in the NPD group did not show more improvements compared to the patients in the non-NPD group.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据