4.5 Review

How changes in brain activity and connectivity are associated with motor performance in people with MS

期刊

NEUROIMAGE-CLINICAL
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 153-162

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.09.019

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; fMRI; Motor performance; Compensation; Pathology; Transcallosal inhibition

资金

  1. United States Department of Veteran's Affairs Rehabilitation Research and Development Service [I01BX007080, 5I21RX001918-02]
  2. National MS Society [PP-1512-0710, RG 5273A1/T]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

People with multiple sclerosis (MS) exhibit pronounced changes in brain structure, activity, and connectivity. While considerable work has begun to elucidate how these neural changes contribute to behavior, the heterogeneity of symptoms and diagnoses makes interpretation of findings and application to clinical practice challenging. In particular, whether MS related changes in brain activity or brain connectivity protect against or contribute to worsening motor symptoms is unclear. With the recent emergence of neuromodulatory techniques that can alter neural activity in specific brain regions, it is critical to establish whether localized brain activation patterns are contributing to (i.e. maladaptive) or protecting against (i.e. adaptive) progression of motor symptoms. In this manuscript, we consolidate recent findings regarding changes in supraspinal structure and activity in people with MS and how these changes may contribute to motor performance. Furthermore, we discuss a hypothesis suggesting that increased neural activity during movement may be either adaptive or maladaptive depending on where in the brain this increase is observed. Specifically, we outline preliminary evidence suggesting sensorimotor cortex activity in the ipsilateral cortices may be maladaptive in people with MS. We also discuss future work that could supply data to support or refute this hypothesis, thus improving our understanding of this important topic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据