4.5 Article

The Suitability of Zn-1.3% Fe Alloy as a Biodegradable Implant Material

期刊

METALS
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met8030153

关键词

zinc; bioabsorbable; biodegradable; implants; encapsulation; in vivo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Efforts to develop metallic zinc for biodegradable implants have significantly advanced following an earlier focus on magnesium (Mg) and iron (Fe). Mg and Fe base alloys experience an accelerated corrosion rate and harmful corrosion products, respectively. The corrosion rate of pure Zn, however, may need to be modified from its reported similar to 20 mu m/year penetration rate, depending upon the intended application. The present study aimed at evaluating the possibility of using Fe as a relatively cathodic biocompatible alloying element in zinc that can tune the implant degradation rate via microgalvanic effects. The selected Zn-1.3wt % Fe alloy composition produced by gravity casting was examined in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro examination included immersion tests, potentiodynamic polarization and impedance spectroscopy, all in a simulated physiological environment (phosphate-buffered saline, PBS) at 37 degrees C. For the in vivo study, two cylindrical disks (seven millimeters diameter and two millimeters height) were implanted into the back midline of male Wister rats. The rats were examined post implantation in terms of weight gain and hematological characteristics, including red blood cell (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB) and white blood cell (WBC) levels. Following retrieval, specimens were examined for corrosion rate measurements and histological analysis of subcutaneous tissue in the implant vicinity. In vivo analysis demonstrated that the Zn-1.3% Fe implant avoided harmful systemic effects. The in vivo and in vitro results indicate that the Zn-1.3% Fe alloy corrosion rate is significantly increased compared to pure zinc. The relatively increased degradation of Zn-1.3% Fe was mainly related to microgalvanic effects produced by a secondary Zn11Fe phase.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据