4.5 Article

Optimization of Sintering Time and Holding Time for 3D Printing of Fe-Based Metallic Glasses

期刊

METALS
卷 8, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/met8060429

关键词

Fe-based metallic glass; amorphous alloy; pneumatic injection; additive manufacturing; 3D printing; sintering temperature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51675226]
  2. Key Scientific and Technological Research Project of Jilin Province [20180201055GX]
  3. Project of International Science and Technology Cooperation of Jilin Province [20170414043GH]
  4. Graduate Innovation Fund of Jilin University [2017143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fe-based metallic glasses are amorphous alloys with high strength, high hardness, and excellent corrosion resistance; however, the immaturity of processing methods has prevented their wide application in industrial production. Fe-based metallic glass parts were manufactured employing pneumatic injection additive manufacturing in this study. An evenly dispersed and stable Fe-based metallic glass powder slurry with a solids content of 50% was prepared firstly. Then the Fe-based metallic glass parts were printed. The printed parts were dried, debinded, and sintered for strengthening. The deformations of the printed parts and sintered parts relative to the original model were then analyzed by a 3D scanning reconstruction method. The slightly average bulging and sunken deformation of the printed parts and sintered parts confirmed the good printing accuracy of the pneumatic injection manufacture system. The effects of the sintering temperature and holding time on the properties of the sintered parts were studied. For a sintering temperature of 580 degrees C and holding time of 1 h, the surface quality of the sintered parts was better. The sintering of 3D-printed Fe-based metallic glass parts was preliminarily realized in this study, and the feasibility of preparing Fe-based metallic glass using pneumatic injection additive manufacture was verified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据