4.2 Article

The effect of metformin on culture conversion in tuberculosis patients with diabetes mellitus

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 933-+

出版社

KOREAN ASSOC INTERNAL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2017.249

关键词

Metformin; Tuberculosis; Diabetes mellitus

资金

  1. Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, of the Republic of Korea [201607/26-2016-91/072]
  2. Seoul National University Hospital Research Fund, of the Republic of Korea [201607/26-2016-91/072]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and tuberculosis (TB) have increased morbidity and a high risk of treatment failure or recurrence. It is important to manage both diseases simultaneously. Among anti-diabetic drugs, metformin inhibits intracellular growth of mycobacteria. Therefore, we examined the effects of metformin on TB treatment, especially in patients with DM. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with culture-positive pulmonary TB diagnosed between 2011 and 2012. The primary study outcome was sputum culture conversion after 2 months of treatment. Results: Of 499 patients diagnosed with culture-positive pulmonary TB, 105 (21%) had DM at diagnosis. Among them, 62 (59.5%) were treated with metformin. Baseline characteristics, except for the presence of chronic renal disease, were not significantly different between the metformin and non-metformin groups. Metformin treatment had no significant effect on sputum culture conversion (p = 0.60) and recurrence within 1 year after TB treatment completion (p = 0.39). However, metformin improved the sputum culture conversion rate in patients with cavitary pulmonary TB, who have higher bacterial loads (odds ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.22 to 95.63). Conclusions: Among cavitary pulmonary TB patients with DM, metformin can be an effective adjunctive anti-TB agent to improve sputum culture conversion after 2 months of treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据