4.3 Review

Association between missing tooth count and mortality: A systematic review

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH
卷 62, 期 2, 页码 134-151

出版社

JAPAN PROSTHODONTIC SOC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2017.08.003

关键词

Tooth count; Missing teeth; Mortality; Edentulism and mortality

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The purpose of this review was to analyze existing literature on the relationship between tooth count and mortality by evaluating the findings in the context of methodological variations. We aimed at addressing the question of whether preserving natural teeth can impact mortality. Study selection: PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL databases were systematically searched using various combinations of related and synonymous keywords for tooth count and mortality. The references of included articles were also evaluated for inclusion. Overall 49 studies found to be eligible were critically evaluated and their key findings were summarized. Results: Studies were conducted in various continents and differed substantially in regards to their sample size, population, methodology, the definition of the tooth count variable, the confounders as well as the mediators accounted for in the analysis. Follow-up period ranged from 1 to 56 years. Conclusions: Although high variability in the studies precludes a definite conclusion about the relationship between number of teeth and mortality, the overall finding from this review is that reduced tooth count is associated with higher mortality. However the impact of factors such as smoking, health-care access, baseline co-morbidity and risk profile, dental and periodontal health, the presence of dental prosthesis as well as socio-economic status, in mediating whole or part of the association cannot be overlooked and needs further investigation using more standard methodologies. Any differences in males vs. females, as well as among different age groups, will also need further consideration in the future studies. (c) 2017 Japan Prosthodontic Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据