4.7 Article

Improving methanol synthesis from carbon-free H-2 and captured CO2: A techno-economic and environmental evaluation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CO2 UTILIZATION
卷 24, 期 -, 页码 555-563

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2018.02.007

关键词

Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) technologies; Methanol synthesis; Renewable hydrogen; Techno-economic assessments

资金

  1. Ministery of Research and Innovation, CNCS - UEFISCDI [PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2016-0031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) is a widely discussed method that can help reduce carbon emissions of energy intensive plants. The goal of this work is to evaluate from a techno-economic point of view such a plant that uses captured CO2 and renewable H-2 obtained in a carbon-free way and produces methanol (MeOH). The paper presents (i) the impact of using a higher conversion rate (30%) than in previously reported works, (ii) the use of a gas turbine and (iii) the addition of organic Rankine cycles (ORC) for reducing the energy consumption. The CCUS plant uses 142.6*10(6) kg of CO2 annually, reduces the amount of CO2 emitted by 140*10(6) kg/year and produces 100*10(6) kg/year of MeOH. H-2 is obtained on site, using a water-electrolyzing unit; this consumes 130 MWe and generates the necessary H-2 for the process. The proposed MeOH production plant is designed and simulated in ChemCAD. Total purchased equipment cost and operational costs are estimated using the process flow modeling. Key performance indicators (KPI) are calculated using the mass and energy balances obtained. The calculated capital costs are similar to previously reported results in the literature. A rigorous mass and energy integration of the plant resulted in an energetically fully self-sufficient MeOH plant, not taking into account the water-hydrolyzing unit. Electricity price is the main contributor for operational costs, either this should be halved, MeOH prices should increase two times or CO2 prices should increase to 0.255 (sic)/kg to make the process economically viable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据