4.1 Review

Clinical Natural Language Processing in languages other than English: opportunities and challenges

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL SEMANTICS
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13326-018-0179-8

关键词

Natural Language Processing; Clinical Decision-Making; Languages other than English

资金

  1. French National Agency for Research [CABeRneT1 ANR-13-JS02-0009-01]
  2. US National Institutes of Health [U24CA184407, LM 10090, GM114355]
  3. Swedish Research Council [2015-00359]
  4. Marie Sklodowska Curie Actions [INCA 600398]
  5. Swedish Research Council [2015-00359] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Natural language processing applied to clinical text or aimed at a clinical outcome has been thriving in recent years. This paper offers the first broad overview of clinical Natural Language Processing (NLP) for languages other than English. Recent studies are summarized to offer insights and outline opportunities in this area. Main Body: We envision three groups of intended readers: (1) NLP researchers leveraging experience gained in other languages, (2) NLP researchers faced with establishing clinical text processing in a language other than English, and (3) clinical informatics researchers and practitioners looking for resources in their languages in order to apply NLP techniques and tools to clinical practice and/or investigation. We review work in clinical NLP in languages other than English. We classify these studies into three groups: (i) studies describing the development of new NLP systems or components de novo, (ii) studies describing the adaptation of NLP architectures developed for English to another language, and (iii) studies focusing on a particular clinical application. Conclusion: We show the advantages and drawbacks of each method, and highlight the appropriate application context. Finally, we identify major challenges and opportunities that will affect the impact of NLP on clinical practice and public health studies in a context that encompasses English as well as other languages.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据