4.6 Review

Recent Advances in Placenta-Heart Interactions

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00735

关键词

congenital heart defects; genetic risk factors; placental insufficiency; heart-placental axis; fetal environment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Congenital heart defects (CHD) occur in similar to 1 in every 100 live births. In addition, an estimated 10% of fetal loss is due to severe forms of CHD. This makes heart defects the most frequently occurring birth defect and single cause of in utero fatality in humans. There is considerable evidence that CHD is heritable, indicating a strong contribution from genetic risk factors. There are also known external environmental exposures that are significantly associated with risk for CHD. Hence, the majority of CHD cases have long been considered to be multifactorial, or generally caused by the confluence of several risk factors potentially from genetic, epigenetic, and environmental sources. Consequently, a specific cause can be very difficult to ascertain, although patterns of associations are very important to prevention. While highly protective of the fetus, the in utero environment is not immune to insult. As the conduit between the mother and fetus, the placenta plays an essential role in maintaining fetal health. Since it is not a fully-formed organ at the onset of pregnancy, the development of the placenta must keep pace with the growth of the fetus in order to fulfill its critical role during pregnancy. In fact, the placenta and the fetal heart actually develop in parallel, a phenomenon known as the placenta-heart axis. This leaves the developing heart particularly vulnerable to early placental insufficiency. Both organs share several developmental pathways, so they also share a common vulnerability to genetic defects. In this article we explore the coordinated development of the placenta and fetal heart and the implications for placental involvement in the etiology and pathogenesis of CHD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据