4.6 Article

Using a Double-Coil TMS Protocol to Assess Preparatory Inhibition Bilaterally

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00139

关键词

transcranial magnetic stimulation; motor-evoked potentials; primary motor cortex; corticospinal excitability; coefficient of variation; action preparation; inhibition

资金

  1. Fonds Speciaux de Recherche (FSR) of the Universite catholique de Louvain
  2. Fondation Medicale Reine Elisabeth (FMRE)
  3. MSCA-FSR COFUND
  4. Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research [FRS-FNRS: MIS F.4512.14]
  5. Fund for Research Training in Industry and Agriculture (FRIA)
  6. FNRS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the primary motor cortex (M1), elicits motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in contralateral limb muscles which are valuable indicators of corticospinal excitability (CSE) at the time of stimulation. So far, most studies have used single-coil TMS over one M1, yielding MEPs in muscles of a single limb-usually the hand. However, tracking CSE in the two hands simultaneously would be useful in many contexts. We recently showed that, in the resting state, double-coil stimulation of the two M1 with a 1ms inter-pulse interval (double-coil(1ms) TMS) elicits MEPs in both hands that are comparable to MEPs obtained using single-coil TMS. To further evaluate this new technique, we considered the MEPs elicited by double-coil(1ms) TMS in an instructed-delay choice reaction time task where a prepared response has to be withheld until an imperative signal is displayed. Single-coil TMS studies have repetitively shown that in this type of task, the motor system is transiently inhibited during the delay period, as evident from the broad suppression of MEP amplitudes. Here, we aimed at investigating whether a comparable inhibitory effect can be observed with MEPs elicited using double-coil(1ms) TMS. To do so, we compared the amplitude as well as the coefficient of variation (CV) of MEPs produced by double-coil(1ms) or single-coil TMS during action preparation. We observed that MEPs were suppressed (smaller amplitude) and often less variable (smaller CV) during the delay period compared to baseline. Importantly, these effects were equivalent whether single-coil or double-coil(1ms) TMS was used. This suggests that double-coil(1ms) TMS is a reliable tool to assess CSE, not only when subjects are at rest, but also when they are involved in a task, opening new research horizons for scientists interested in the corticospinal correlates of human behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据