4.6 Article

SP8 Transcriptional Regulation of Cyclin D1 During Mouse Early Corticogenesis

期刊

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00119

关键词

corticogenesis; gene expression regulation; Cyclin D1; transcription factors; SP8; PAX6

资金

  1. LABEX CORTEX ANR-14-CE13-0036 [ANR-11-LABX-0042, ANR-11-IDEX-0007, ANR-10-IBHU-0003, ANR-14-CE13-0036]
  2. LABEX DEVWECAN of Universite de Lyon [ANR-11-IDEX-0007, ANR-10-IBHU-0003, ANR-14-CE13-0036, ANR-10-LABX-0061]
  3. Fondation Neurodis
  4. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [ING20130526653, Equipe DEQ20160334943]
  5. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-14-CE13-0036] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multiple signals control the balance between proliferation and differentiation of neural progenitor cells during corticogenesis. A key point of this regulation is the control of G1 phase length, which is regulated by the Cyclin/Cdks complexes. Using genome-wide chromatin immunoprecipitation assay and mouse genetics, we have explored the transcriptional regulation of Cyclin D1 (Ccnd1) during the early developmental stages of the mouse cerebral cortex. We found evidence that SP8 binds to the Ccnd1 locus on exon regions. In vitro experiments show SP8 binding activity on Ccnd1 gene 3 '-end, and point to a putative role for SP8 in modulating PAX6-mediated repression of Ccnd1 along the dorso-ventral axis of the developing pallium, creating a medialLow-lateralHigh gradient of neuronal differentiation. Activation of Ccnd1 through the promoter/5 '-end of the gene does not depend on SP8, but on b catenin (CTNNB1). Importantly, alteration of the Sp8 level of expression in vivo affects Ccnd1 expression during early corticogenesis. Our results indicate that Ccnd1 regulation is the result of multiple signals and that SP8 is a player in this regulation, revealing an unexpected and potentially novel mechanism of transcriptional activation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据