4.5 Article

Acute Down-regulation of BDNF Signaling Does Not Replicate Exacerbated Amyloid-β Levels and Cognitive Impairment Induced by Cholinergic Basal Forebrain Lesion

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00051

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; basal forebrain; cholinergic neuron; amyloid-beta; brain-derived neurotrophic factor; APP/PS1 transgenic mouse

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1049236]
  2. Australian Postgraduate Award
  3. Alzheimer's Australia Dementia Research Foundation Top-Up Scholarship
  4. Australian Research Council Linkage Infrastructure, Equipment and Facilities Grant [LE100100074]
  5. Alzheimers Research UK [ARUK-TVPG2017-1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Degeneration of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (BFCNs) precedes hippocampal degeneration and pathological amyloid-beta (A beta) accumulation, and underpins the development of cognitive dysfunction in sporadic Alzheimer's disease(AD). We hypothesized that degeneration of BFCNs causes a decrease in neurotrophin levels in innervated brain areas, which in turn promotes the development of A beta pathology and cognitive impairment. Here we show that lesion of septo-hippocampal BFCNs in a pre-symptomatic transgenic amyloid AD mouse model (APP/PS1 mice) increases soluble A beta levels in the hippocampus, and induces cognitive deficits in a spatial memory task that are not seen in either unlesioned APP/PS1 or non-transgenic littermate control mice. Furthermore, the BFCN lesion results in decreased levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). However, viral knockdown of neuronal BDNF in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 mice (in the absence of BFCN loss) neither increased the level of A beta nor caused cognitive deficits. These results suggest that the cognitive decline and A beta pathology induced by BFCN loss occur independent of dysfunctional neuronal BDNF signaling, and may therefore be directly underpinned by reduced cholinergic neurotransmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据