4.5 Review

Critical Issues in BDNF Val66Met Genetic Studies of Neuropsychiatric Disorders

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnmol.2018.00156

关键词

brain-derived neurotrophic factor; Val66Met polymorphism; transgenic mice; genetic study; age; sex; environmental factors; ethnicity

资金

  1. Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 107-2634-F-075-002, MOST 104-2745-B-075-002]
  2. Taipei Veterans General Hospital [V105E17-002-MY2-1, V105D17-002-MY2-2, VGHUST103-G1-4-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neurotrophins have been implicated in the pathophysiology of many neuropsychiatric diseases. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is the most abundant and widely distributed neurotrophin in the brain. Its Val66Met polymorphism (refSNP Cluster Report: rs6265) is a common and functional single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) affecting the activity-dependent release of BDNF. BDNF Val66Met transgenic mice have been generated, which may provide further insight into the functional impact of this polymorphism in the brain. Considering the important role of BDNF in brain function, more than 1,100 genetic studies have investigated this polymorphism in the past 15 years. Although these studies have reported some encouraging positive findings initially, most of the findings cannot be replicated in following studies. These inconsistencies in BDNF Val66Met genetic studies may be attributed to many factors such as age, sex, environmental factors, ethnicity, genetic model used for analysis, and gene-gene interaction, which are discussed in this review. We also discuss the results of recent studies that have reported the novel functions of this polymorphism. Because many BDNF polymorphisms and non-genetic factors have been implicated in the complex traits of neuropsychiatric diseases, the conventional genetic association-based method is limited to address these complex interactions. Future studies should apply data mining and machine learning techniques to determine the genetic role of BDNF in neuropsychiatric diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据