4.3 Article Retracted Publication

被撤回的出版物: MicroR-9-5p suppresses EV71 replication through targeting NFB of the RIG-I-mediated innate immune response (Retracted article. See vol. 13, pg. 795, 2023)

期刊

FEBS OPEN BIO
卷 8, 期 9, 页码 1457-1470

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.12490

关键词

EV71; inflammation; innate immunity; miR-9; NF kappa B

资金

  1. Research Fund of Jinan Maternity and Child Care Hospital

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accumulating evidence demonstrates that there is a causative link between hsa-microRNA-9-5p (miR-9) and pathophysiological processes. Enterovirus 71 (EV71) has been found to contribute to numerous severe clinical symptoms which result in death. The exact mechanism by which EV71 influences miR-9 expression is unknown, and the relationship between miR-9 and EV71 is still unclear. Here, miR-9 expression was found to be impaired upon EV71 infection in several cell lines and in an EV71 infection mouse model. Additionally, we confirmed that EV71 infection induces robust expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-, IL-6, and IL-1) and interferons (IFN- and IFN-). Overexpression of miR-9 attenuated EV71 proliferation and reduced protein and gene expressions of virion protein 1 (VP1) of EV71. Furthermore, we observed that the inflammation caused by EV71 infection was restored to a moderate level via miR-9 overexpression. Nuclear factor kappa B (NFB) in the retinoic acid-induced gene 1 (RIG-I) signaling pathway, but not interferon regulating factor 3 (IRF3), was significantly decreased and inactivated by ectopic miR-9 expression. Moreover, in mouse infection experiments, administration of miR-9 agomirs caused a significant decrease in VP1 levels and pro-inflammatory cytokine production after viral inoculation. Taken together, the present data demonstrate that miR-9 exerts an anti-EV71 effect in cells and a mouse model via mediating NFB activity of the RIG-I signal pathway, thereby suggesting a new candidate for antiviral drug development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据