4.6 Article

Experimental and theoretical investigations on Se(iv) and Se(vi) adsorption to UiO-66-based metal-organic frameworks

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-NANO
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 1441-1453

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8en00180d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51379009]
  2. Basic Scientific Research Special Fund of Non-profit Research Institutions at the Central Level of China [HKY-JBYW-2016-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adsorption behaviors and mechanisms of selenite [Se(iv)] and selenate [Se(vi)] on two types of zirconium metal-organic frameworks (MOFs, UiO-66 and UiO-66-NH2) were investigated using batch experiments, spectroscopic analyses, and theoretical calculations. Se(iv) adsorption was substantially greater than Se(vi) adsorption. Intriguingly, with increasing solution pH, Se(iv) adsorption increased to a maximum at pH 7, whereas Se(vi) adsorption monotonically decreased. Se(iv) adsorption was not influenced by coexisting ions except for PO43-, whereas Se(vi) adsorption was in general decreased with increasing coexisting ion concentrations. The underlying molecular binding mechanisms were elucidated via zeta potential, XPS, and FTIR analyses as well as density functional theory calculations. Se(iv) formed a strong inner-sphere complex with the MOFs via Lewis acid/base complexation between the Zr coordinatively unsaturated sites and HSeO3- or SeO32- (-59.4 to -142 kJ mol(-1)) and hydrogen bonding between Zr-O-C and H2SeO3 (-24.4 to -29.8 kJ mol(-1)). Se(vi) formed outer-sphere complexes with the MOFs through electrostatic interactions (-50.6 to -62.1 kJ mol(-1)). Thus, the BET surface area was the predominant factor determining the Se(iv) adsorption, whereas both the surface charge and BET surface area controlled the Se(vi) adsorption. This study provided new insights on the molecular interactions between Se(iv) and the MOFs, and revealed the distinct differences between the Se(iv) and Se(vi) adsorptions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据