4.7 Article

Restructuring the export-oriented industrialization in the Pearl River Delta, China: Institutional evolution and emerging tension

期刊

APPLIED GEOGRAPHY
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 143-157

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.013

关键词

Industrial restructuring; Export-oriented industrialization; Institution; Evolution; Tension; Pearl River Delta; China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rise of the Pearl River Delta (PRD) as a promising workshop of the world factory in China has attributed to the export-oriented industrialization driven by foreign direct investment, particularly Overseas Chinese investment from Hong Kong and Taiwan initiated in the late 1970s. The export-oriented industrialization has embedded in the flexible institutions favourable for foreign investors and local authorities, via the salient entry mode, i.e. processing with supplied materials (lailiaojiagong). Since the mid-2000s, the export-oriented industrialization has undergone dramatic restructuring to cope with the changing business environment at global, national and regional and firm levels. Drawing upon the evolutionary and institutional perspectives in geographical political economy approach, this study argues that the prevailed institutions conducive for the export-oriented processing have evolved into institutional inertia and territorial embeddedness as obstacles for the on-going restructuring, particularly the market reorientation from export to domestic sale. Moreover, difficulties of restructuring through the state-designated relocation have been heightened by the resistance from below and emerging state-firm tension. The institutional evolution of the export-oriented industrialization in the PRO has enriched the literature on industrial restructuring in the context of dynamic global local interactions, but also provided fundamental implications for formulating well-coordinated restructuring strategies among various institutions and concerned actors. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据