4.5 Review

Nanocarbon-Based Electrocatalysts for Rechargeable Aqueous Li/Zn-Air Batteries

期刊

CHEMELECTROCHEM
卷 5, 期 14, 页码 1745-1763

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.201800141

关键词

lithium-air batteries; zinc-air batteries; electrocatalysts; nanocarbons; oxygen reduction reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21503025, 21603019]
  2. Ministry of Education of Singapore [MOE2015-T2-1-148, M4011424.110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rechargeable aqueous Li/Zn-air batteries have become the most attractive energy storage devices because of their extremely high theoretical energy density, which enables electric vehicles to drive long range. However, current achievements still suffer from poor cycle life, low practical energy density, low round-trip efficiency, and high manufacturing costs. One of the key challenges is the sluggish kinetics of oxygen electrochemistry during discharge and charge cycles. Thus, significant breakthroughs in design and synthesis of efficient electrocatalysts for the oxygen redox reaction are highly demanded. Nanocarbons, especially heteroatoms doped nanocarbons, are potential oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts due to the reasonable balance between catalytic activity, durability, and cost. Importantly, by introduction of transition metal nanoparticles, spinel oxides, layered-double hydroxides, perovskite oxides, and other metal oxides, the constructed nanocarbon-based materials could deliver promising bifunctional ORR and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalytic properties, which could be employed as air-cathode materials to improve energy storage performances, even to get commercialized. Here, an overview of the recent progress of nanocarbon-based electrocatalysts as air-cathode materials for rechargeable aqueous Li/Zn-air batteries is provided, aiming to highlight the benefits and issues of nanocarbon-based electrocatalysts as well as to outline the most promising results and applications so far.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据