4.6 Article

The efficacy of adding targeted agents to neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients: a meta-analysis

期刊

CANCER MEDICINE
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 565-582

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1298

关键词

Efficacy; neoadjuvant therapy; pathologic complete response; rectal cancer; targeted agents

类别

资金

  1. Clinical Capability Construction Project for Liaoning Provincial Hospitals [LNCCC-A01-2014]
  2. Key Laboratory Programme of Education Department of Liaoning Province [LZ2015076]
  3. Scientific Programme of Science & Technology Department of Liaoning Province [2015225002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) are at tremendous risk of metastatic diseases. To improve the prognoses of LARC patients, the efficacy of adding targeted agents to neoadjuvant therapy has been investigated by many researchers but remains controversial. A literature search of relevant databases was conducted through December 2016, 804 studies were identified and 32 investigations were ultimately included. A total of 1196 patients from 31 cohorts of 29 studies were eligible for quantitative synthesis in this single-arm setting meta-analysis. As pathologic complete response (pCR) shows promise as a prognosis indicator, we focused on pCR rates to evaluate whether adding targeted agents to neoadjuvant therapies improves the outcome of LARC patients. In our study, we revealed pooled estimates of pCR of 27% (95%CI, 21-34%) and 14% (95%CI, 9-21%) for bevacizumab-relevant cohorts and cetuximab-relevant cohorts, respectively. The safety of adding targeted agents to neoadjuvant therapy was also evaluated by pooling the data of Grade 3/4 toxicity. In conclusion, our study revealed that adding bevacizumab to the neoadjuvant therapy regimens provides appreciable pCR for LARC patients. Meanwhile, the efficacy of cetuximab remains inconclusive, RCTs with larger scale and better study design that stress more on mutational status are needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据