4.3 Article

Adjustable delivery of pro-angiogenic FGF-2 by alginate: collagen microspheres

期刊

BIOLOGY OPEN
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/bio.027060

关键词

Hydrogels; Microspheres; Angiogenesis; Vasculature; Zebrafish

类别

资金

  1. Svenska Sallskapet for Medicinsk Forskning
  2. Ake-Wiberg Foundation
  3. Goesta Fraenkel Foundation
  4. Ahrens Stiftelse
  5. Ollie och Elof Ericssons Stiftelse
  6. Carmen och Bertil Ragners Stiftelse
  7. KI Stiftelser och fonder
  8. Loo och Hans Ostermans Stiftelse for Medicinsk Forskning
  9. Vetenskapsradet
  10. Linkoping University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Therapeutic induction of blood vessel growth (angiogenesis) in ischemic tissues holds great potential for treatment of myocardial infarction and stroke. Achieving sustained angiogenesis and vascular maturation has, however, been highly challenging. Here, we demonstrate that alginate: collagen hydrogels containing therapeutic, pro-angiogenic FGF-2, and formulated as microspheres, is a promising and clinically relevant vehicle for therapeutic angiogenesis. By titrating the amount of readily dissolvable and degradable collagen with more slowly degradable alginate in the hydrogel mixture, the degradation rates of the biomaterial controlling the release kinetics of embedded proangiogenic FGF-2 can be adjusted. Furthermore, we elaborate a microsphere synthesis protocol allowing accurate control over sphere size, also a critical determinant of degradation/release rate. As expected, alginate: collagen microspheres were completely biocompatible and did not cause any adverse reactions when injected in mice. Importantly, the amount of pro-angiogenic FGF-2 released from such microspheres led to robust induction of angiogenesis in zebrafish embryos similar to that achieved by injecting FGF-2-releasing cells. These findings highlight the use of microspheres constructed from alginate: collagen hydrogels as a promising and clinically relevant delivery system for pro-angiogenic therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据