4.3 Article

Robust interaction of IFT70 with IFT52-IFT88 in the IFT-B complex is required for ciliogenesis

期刊

BIOLOGY OPEN
卷 7, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/bio.033241

关键词

Cilia; IFT-B complex; IFT70; IFT22

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [15H01211]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15H04370, 15K07929]
  3. Astellas Foundation for Research on Metabolic Disorders
  4. Takeda Science Foundation
  5. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [15K07929, 15H01211, 15H04370] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the intraflagellar transport (IFT) machinery, the IFT-B and IFT-A complexes mediate anterograde and retrograde ciliary protein trafficking, respectively. Among the 16 subunits of the IFT-B complex, several subunits are essential for ciliogenesis, whereas others, which are associated peripherally with the complex, are dispensable for ciliogenesis but play a role in protein trafficking. IFT22-knockout (KO) cells established in this study demonstrated no defects in ciliogenesis or ciliary protein trafficking. In stark contrast, IFT70A and IFT70B double-knockout cells did not form cilia, even though IFT70 is associated peripherally with the IFT-B complex via the IFT52-IFT88 dimer, and other IFT-B subunits assembled at the ciliary base in the absence of IFT70. Exogenous expression of either IFT70A or IFT70B restored the ciliogenesis defect of IFT70-KO cells, indicating their redundant roles. IFT70 has 15 consecutive tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs) followed by a short helix (alpha 36). Deletion of the first TPR or alpha 36 of IFT70A greatly reduced its ability to interact with the IFT52-IFT88 dimer. Exogenous expression of any of the IFT70A deletion mutants in IFT70-KO cells could not restore ciliogenesis. These results show that IFT70 plays an essential role in ciliogenesis, although it is dispensable for assembly of the residual IFT-B subunits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据