4.5 Article

Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor 1 Antagonist SAR100842 for Patients With Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis A Double-Blind, Randomized, Eight-Week Placebo-Controlled Study Followed by a Sixteen-Week Open-Label Extension Study

期刊

ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY
卷 70, 期 10, 页码 1634-1643

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/art.40547

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sanofi
  2. Actelion
  3. Bayer
  4. Biogen
  5. Genentech-Roche
  6. Galapagos
  7. Medac
  8. Pfizer
  9. Servier
  10. UCB
  11. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  12. Inventiva
  13. AbbVie
  14. iQone Healthcare
  15. 4D Science
  16. Active Biotec
  17. Biogen Idec
  18. Boehringer Ingelheim
  19. ChemomAb
  20. Epi-Pharm
  21. EspeRare Foundation
  22. GlaxoSmithKline
  23. Eli Lilly and Company
  24. Mepha
  25. MedImmune
  26. Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma
  27. Pharmacyclics
  28. Serodapharm
  29. Sinoxa
  30. CSL Behring
  31. Merck-Serono
  32. Sanofi-Aventis
  33. EMD Merck-Serono
  34. Corbus
  35. Cytori

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Preclinical studies suggest a role for lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) in the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis (SSc). We undertook this study to assess SAR100842, a potent selective oral antagonist of the LPA(1) receptor, for safety, biomarkers, and clinical efficacy in patients with diffuse cutaneous SSc (dcSSc). Methods. An 8-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study followed by a 16-week open-label extension with SAR100842 was performed in patients with early dcSSc who had a baseline modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS) of at least 15. The primary end point was safety during the double-blind phase of the trial. Exploratory end points included the identification of an LPA-induced gene signature in patients' skin. Results. Seventeen of 32 patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo and 15 to receive SAR100842; 30 patients participated in the open-label extension study. The most frequent adverse events reported for SAR100842 during the blinded phase were headache, diarrhea, nausea, and falling, and the safety profile was acceptable during the open-label extension. At week 8, the reduction in MRSS was numerically greater in the SAR100842 group than in the placebo group (mean SD change -3.57 +/- 4.18 versus -2.76 +/- 4.85; treatment effect -1.2 [95% confidence interval -4.37, 2.02]; P = 0.46). A greater reduction of LPA-related genes was observed in skin samples from the SAR100842 group at week 8, indicating LPA(1) target engagement. Conclusion. SAR100842, a selective orally available LPA(1) receptor antagonist, was well tolerated in patients with dcSSc. The MRSS improved during the study although the difference was not significant, and additional gene signature analysis suggested target engagement. These results need to be confirmed in a larger controlled trial.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据