4.5 Article

Ultrafast Heterogeneous Nucleation Enables a Hierarchical Surface Configuration of Lithium-Rich Layered Oxide Cathode Material for Enhanced Electrochemical Performances

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS INTERFACES
卷 5, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201701465

关键词

aluminum oxide; heterogeneous nucleation; layered; spinel cathodes; lithium-ion batteries; lithium-rich layered oxides

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0100100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51403227]
  3. CAS
  4. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) [XDA09010101]
  5. Department of Energy, USA (CAS-DOS) [174433KYSB20150047]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-rich layered oxides have attracted much attention for the high energy density, but they still suffer from cycling degradation and sluggish kinetic capability. In the present study, a novel modification of Li1.143Mn0.544Ni0.136Co0.136O2 sphere cathode materials by a hierarchical surface configuration is proposed, which integrates advantages of dual oxide layers of both amorphous and nanocrystalline Al2O3, as well as an inner spinel membrane. Mainly promoted by an ultrafast heterogeneous nucleation of Al(NO)(3) nanoseeds caused by huge solubility differences, it only takes several minutes for pretreatment. After common annealing at low temperature, the obtained material is capable to deliver a high discharge capacity of 296.3 mAh g(-1) with initial Coulombic efficiency of 92.9% at 0.1 C rate, and maintain stable cycling at both 0.2 and 0.5 C rates. Besides, rate performances are also enhanced as a result of the superior interface gained after surface modification, which produces reduced polarization during cycling. Through comprehensive analyses, improved surface property and stability are confirmed as the key to these enhancements. This strategy is anticipated to inspire new modification designs in future high energy density cathode materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据