4.6 Article

ZnS Shells Enhance Triplet Energy Transfer from CdSe Nanocrystals for Photon Upconversion

期刊

ACS PHOTONICS
卷 5, 期 8, 页码 3089-3096

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsphotonics.8b00338

关键词

semiconductor nanocrystal; core-shell; zinc sulfide; triplet energy transfer; upconversion

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1351663, 1532125, 1465284]
  2. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1532125, 1465284, 1351663] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Division Of Chemistry [1351663, 1465284] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Materials Research [1532125] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triplet energy transfer (TET) from semiconductor nanocrystals (NCs) to molecules is one of the bottlenecks that limits the efficiency of photon upconversion. While an inorganic shell can enhance the photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQYs), the role of the shell with respect to TET is still not clear. In this work, CdS and ZnS shells with different shell thickness are grown on 2.9 nm diameter CdSe NCs, resulting in nanostructures here that have increased radiative rates compared to the core. TET from these NCs to bound 9-anthracene carboxylic acid is investigated with linear photon upconversion measurements, time-resolved photoluminescence lifetime, and transient absorption spectroscopy. The ZnS shell enhances the photon upconversion QYs 1.6 times from 5.7% to 9.3%, with a concurrent increase of TET efficiency from 6.68% to 12.9% and the net rate of TET from 4.97 x 10(8) s(-1) to 6.67 x 10(10) s(-1). In contrast, TET is barely observed for CdSe/CdS core-shell NCs. Considering the changes in PLQYs and upconversion QYs, a sub-monolayer ZnS shell enhances TET by removing surface traps and increasing exciton lifetime, while a thick shell creates an energy barrier that diminishes TET. The shorter exciton lifetime and increased exciton-phonon coupling due to CdS explain the drastically different effects of ZnS and CdS shells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据