4.7 Article

Genetic estimators of DNA methylation provide insights into the molecular basis of polygenic traits

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41398-017-0070-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Basel
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [320030_159740, 320030_163434]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [KND: 01GI0102, 01GI0420, 01GI0422, 01GI0423, 01GI0429, 01GI0431, 01GI0433, 01GI0434, KNDD: 01GI1007A, 01GI0710, 01GI0711, 01GI0712, 01GI0713, 01GI0714, 01GI0715, 01GI0716, 01ET1006B]
  4. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research within the project 'Diet-Body- Brain (DietBB)-Competence Cluster in Nutrition Research' [BMBF: FKZ 01EA1410A, 01EA1410B, 01EA1410E]
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [320030_159740, 320030_163434] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The large biological distance between genetic risk loci and their mechanistic consequences in the tissue of interest limits the ability to establish functionality of susceptibility variants for genetically complex traits. Such a biological gap may be reduced through the systematic study of molecular mediators of genomic action, such as epigenetic modification. Here, we report the identification of robust genetic estimators of whole-blood CpG methylation, which can serve as intermediate molecular traits amenable to association testing with other genetically complex traits. We describe the relationship between these estimators and gene expression, demonstrate their genome-wide applicability to association testing even in the absence of individual genotypic data, and show that these estimators powerfully identify methylation-related genomic loci associated with polygenic traits and common diseases, such as schizophrenia. The use of genetic estimators for blood DNA methylation, which are made publically available, can serve as a valuable tool for the identification of epigenetic underpinnings of complex traits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据