4.5 Article

Gene expression kinetics governs stimulus-specific decoration of the Salmonella outer membrane

期刊

SCIENCE SIGNALING
卷 11, 期 529, 页码 -

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aar7921

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 AI120558]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipid A is the innermost component of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) molecules that occupy the outer leaflet of the outer membrane in Gram-negative bacteria. Lipid A is recognized by the host immune system and targeted by cationic antimicrobial compounds. In Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, the phosphates of lipid A are chemically modified by enzymes encoded by targets of the transcriptional regulator PmrA. These modifications increase resistance to the cationic peptide antibiotic polymyxin B by reducing the negative charge of the LPS. We report the mechanism by which Salmonella produces different lipid A profiles when PmrA is activated by low Mg2+ versus a mildly acidic pH. Low Mg2+ favored modification of the lipid A phosphates with 4-amino-4-deoxy-l-aminoarabinose (l-Ara4N) by activating the regulatory protein PhoP, which initially increased the LPS negative charge by promoting transcription of lpxT, encoding an enzyme that adds an additional phosphate group to lipid A. Later, PhoP activated PmrA posttranslationally, resulting in expression of PmrA-activated genes, including those encoding the LpxT inhibitor PmrR and enzymes responsible for the incorporation of l-Ara4N. By contrast, a mildly acidic pH favored modification of the lipid A phosphates with a mixture of l-Ara4N and phosphoethanolamine (pEtN) by simultaneously inducing the PhoP-activated lpxT and PmrA-activated pmrR genes. Although l-Ara4N reduces the LPS negative charge more than does pEtN, modification of lipid A phosphates solely with l-Ara4N required a prior transient increase in lipid A negative charge. Our findings demonstrate how bacteria tailor their cell surface to different stresses, such as those faced inside phagocytes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据