4.8 Article

N-doped C-encapsulated scale-like yolk-shell frame assembled by expanded planes few-layer MoSe2 for enhanced performance in sodium-ion batteries

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 639-648

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.07.021

关键词

Sodium ion batteries; Yolk-shell structure; N-doping few-layer MoSe2; Rate performance

资金

  1. Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (973 Program) [2014CB643406]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51474191, 21467030]
  3. Key National Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province [2018FA028]
  4. Program for Outstand Young Talents of Yunnan University [201807]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To meet the pressing needs of fast development of energy and environmental science, sodium ion batteries (SIBs) are considered as the promising novel generation of power storage system, due to abundant reserves and low price of sodium sources. In this work, N-doped C-encapsulated scale-like yolk-shell structured MoSe2-C materials assembled by expanded (002) planes few-layer MoSe2 nanosheets are successfully synthesized by a facile general strategy. The few-layer crystal fringes are no more than 4 layers. Notably, the interlayer spacing of (002) planes is expanded to 1.15 nm, which is larger than its intrinsic value of pristine MoSe2 (0.64 nm). Particularly, the fewlayer nanosheets with expanded (002) planes are spaced-restricted growing in the inner wall and the surface of hollow carbon frame and form scale-like yolk-shell hybrid MoSe2-C structure. When evaluated as anode for SIBs, the MoSe2-C materials show ultra-long cycling life, maintaining 378 mA h g(-1) over 1000 cycles at 3 A g(-1). It also exhibits outstanding rate capability and the Coulombic efficiencies for all the rate performance reaching more than 98.3% except the first one. The expanded (002) planes, 2D fewer-layer nanosheets and unique N-doped C-encapsulated scale-like yolk-shell frame are responsible for the enhanced electrochemical performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据