4.8 Article

Tailoring the electrocatalytic activity of bimetallic nickel-iron diselenide hollow nanochains for water oxidation

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 275-284

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.010

关键词

Selenides; Hollow nanochain; Kirkendall effect; Active sites; Electrocatalyst

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51502099, 51571096]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China (Materials Genome Initiative) [2017YFB0701700]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HUST: 2016YXMS211]
  4. Hubei Chu-Tian Young Scholar Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Exploring low-cost, high-efficient and durable electrocatalysts to substitute for Ru, Ir-based noble metal catalysts is of great significance for oxygen evolution reaction (OER), which is in particular a sluggish anodic process in water oxidation and remains to be a major challenge that we are confronted with. Herein, we report nickel-iron diselenide hollow nanochains (denoted as NFSHNCs) synthesized via a two-step hydrothermal method working as the high performance OER catalyst. The formation of well-shaped NFSHNCs is due to the Kirkendall effect, in which NiFe alloy solid nanochains were employed as the precursors. The as-prepared NFSHNCs not only exhibit outstanding OER performance with low overpotential of 267 mV (at a current density of 10 mA cm(-2)) and small Tafel slope of 67 mV dec(-1), superior to the state-of-the-art commercial RuO2, but also deliver high durability with a dinky degradation of 5.3% after 12 h fierce test. To identify the electrocatalytic active sites, the Gibbs free energy differences (Delta G) related to the O* and OH* adsorption on NiFe selenides were calculated with density functional theory. The theoretical results corroborate the fact that the O* and OH* adsorption prefers to occur on both iron sites and the nickel sites (the one that in the vicinity of iron sites) because of the synergistic effects of electron configuration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据