4.8 Article

Spatially confined synthesis of vanadium nitride nanodots intercalated carbon nanosheets with ultrahigh volumetric capacitance and long life for flexible supercapacitors

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 128-136

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.053

关键词

Vanadium nitride; Spatially confined strategy; Supercapacitor; Volumetric capacitance; Cycle life

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51572100, 61434001]
  2. HUST Key Interdisciplinary Team Project [2016JCTD101]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HUST: 2015QN071]
  4. Wuhan Yellow Crane Talents Program
  5. City University of Hong Kong Applied Research Grant (ARG) [9667122]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High volumetric capacitance electrode materials are highly desirable for miniaturized and portable capacitive storage devices. Herein, a spatially confined strategy to prepare 0D-in-2D pillared lamellar hybrid comprising vanadium nitride nanodots intercalated carbon nanosheets (VNNDs/CNSs) is proposed for promising capacitive material with high volumetric capacitance. The VNNDs/CNSs shows an ultrahigh volumetric capacitance of 1203.6 F cm(-3) at 1.1 A cm(-3) and rate capability of 703.1 F cm(-3) at 210 A cm(-3) surpassing those of carbon, transition metal oxides/nitrides. Even the 150 mu m-thick film electrode comprising VNNDs/CNSs has a volumetric capacitance of 867.1 F cm(-3). Moreover, the VNNDs/CNSs electrode exhibits extraordinary cycling stability with 90% capacitance retention after 10,000 cycles. The all-solid-state symmetric flexible supercapacitor based on VNNDs/CNSs electrodes boasts a high volumetric energy density/power density of 30.9 Wh L-1/64, 500 W L-1 with 91% capacitance retention after 10000 cycles, rendering promising applications in high-performance flexible supercapacitors. The strategy provides an insight into the rational design of compact, robust and highly conductive electrode materials with high volumetric capacitances and long life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据