4.8 Article

Achieving commercial-level mass loading in ternary-doped holey graphene hydrogel electrodes for ultrahigh energy density supercapacitors

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 266-276

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.02.007

关键词

Supercapacitors; B, N, P, ternary-doped; Holey graphene hydrogel; Commercial level graphene mass loading; Ultrahigh energy density

资金

  1. CAS-Queensland Collaborative Science Fund [121E32KYSB20160032]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21403287, 21433013, 51402345]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0100100]
  4. CAS-DOE [121E32KYSB20150004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Enabling fast ion diffusion in thick electrodes (100-200 mu m, similar to 10 mg cm(-2)) is critical for their practical application in state-of-the-art supercapacitors (SCs). We developed a three-dimensional (3D) boron, nitrogen, and phosphorus ternary-doped holey graphene hydrogel (BNP-HGH) film to achieve an optimized porous structure with a high electrical conductivity, large ion accessible surface area, efficient electron and ion transport pathways, as well as high ion adsorption capacity. The binder-free BNP-HGH electrode can deliver a specific capacitance of 350 F g(-1) and a volumetric capacity of 234 F cm(-3), which are the best performance reported so far for graphene-based SCs using an organic electrolyte. Fully packaged SCs using the BNP-HGH electrodes with a commercial level graphene mass loading (150 mu m, similar to 10 mg cm(-2)) can deliver ultrahigh stack gravimetric and volumetric energy densities of 38.5 Wh kg(-1) and 57.4 Wh L-1, respectively, which are comparable to those of lead-acid batteries (35-40 Wh kg(-1) and 50-90 Wh L-1) while maintaining an ultrahigh power density of 83 kW kg(-1) (similar to 55 kW L-1) as well as a long cycle life (81.3% capacitance retention over 50,000 cycles). The high energy and power densities bridge the gap between traditional SCs and batteries, and should be very useful in practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据