4.8 Article

High-performance pouch- type hybrid supercapacitor based on hierarchical NiO-Co3O4-NiO composite nanoarchitectures as an advanced electrode material

期刊

NANO ENERGY
卷 48, 期 -, 页码 81-92

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.037

关键词

Core-shell architectures; Composite metal oxides; Hybrid supercapacitors; Electrochemical performance; Cycling stability

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIP) [2017R1A2B4011998]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The core-shell-like architectures consisting of NiO nanosheet arrays grafted Co3O4-NiO fish thorns-like nanostructures (NiO NSAs@Co3O4-NiO FTNs) were successfully prepared by a simple solution-based method. With an aid of ammonium fluoride (NH4F), the morphological evolution of Co3O4-NiO FTNs was elaborated effectively. Subsequently, the NiO NSAs were uniformly decorated on the Co3O4-NiO FTNs to form a core-shell-like composite material for positive electrode in hybrid supercapacitors (HSCs). The core-shell-like composite exhibited a large surface area with high open porous channels, which intends to deliver high areal capacity of 313.9 mu Ah/cm(2) (at 4 mA/cm(2)) in 1M KOH, and it is 1.84 and 3.9 times higher than the Co3O4-NiO FTNs and solitary NiO NSAs electrodes. Furthermore, we fabricated a pouch-type HSC with core-shell-like NiO NSAs@ Co3O4-NiO FTNs as a positive electrode and activated carbon as a negative electrode in aqueous alkaline electrolyte. At a current density of 2 mA/cm(2), the fabricated HSC provides high areal capacitance of 623.5 mF/cm(2) with a maximum energy density of 216.1 mu Wh/cm(2) and power density of 27.7 mW/cm(2). In addition, the HSC showed superior cycling stability with a capacity retention of 126% after 5000 cycles, indicating the great promise of practical applications. Thanks to the comprehensive electrochemical performance, the pouch-type HSCs effectively operated a toy motor fan and light-emitting diode bulb for real-life applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据