4.7 Article

Makespan and Energy Robust Stochastic Static Resource Allocation of a Bag-of-Tasks to a Heterogeneous Computing System

期刊

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2014.2362921

关键词

Heterogeneous computing; static resource allocation; power-aware computing; DVFS; robustness

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [CNS-0615170, CNS-0905399, CCF-1302693]
  2. Colorado State University George T. Abell Endowment
  3. NSF Grant [CNS-0923386]
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  5. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1302693] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Today's data centers face the issue of balancing electricity use and completion times of their workloads. Rising electricity costs are forcing data center operators to either operate within an electricity budget or to reduce electricity use as much as possible while still maintaining service agreements. Energy-aware resource allocation is one technique a system administrator can employ to address both problems: optimizing the workload completion time (makespan) when given an energy budget, or to minimize energy consumption subject to service guarantees (such as adhering to deadlines). In this paper, we study the problem of energy-aware static resource allocation in an environment where a collection of independent (non-communicating) tasks (bag-of-tasks) is assigned to a heterogeneous computing system. Computing systems often operate in environments where task execution times vary (e.g., due to cache misses or data dependent execution times). We model these execution times stochastically, using probability density functions. We want our resource allocations to be robust against these variations, where we define energy-robustness as the probability that the energy budget is not violated, and makespan-robustness as the probability a makespan deadline is not violated. We develop and analyze several heuristics for energy-aware resource allocation for both energy-constrained and deadline-constrained problems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据