期刊
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL DECISION MAKING
卷 25, 期 1, 页码 95-108出版社
WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/bdm.717
关键词
decision making; games; learning; recursive reasoning; theory of mind
The literature on recursive theory of mind (TOM) reasoning in interactive decision making (reasoning of the type I think that you think that I think ...) has been pessimistic, suggesting that adults attribute to others levels of reasoning that are low and slow to increase with learning. In four experiments with college-age adults playing sequential games, we examined whether choices and predictions were consistent with believing that others pursue their immediate self-interest, or with believing that others reason through their own decision making, with fixed-sum games that were simpler and more competitive. This manipulation led to higher-level default TOM reasoning; indeed, reasoning against a lower-level opponent was frequently consistent with assuming the opponent's reasoning to be higher-level, leading to sub-optimal choices. We conclude that TOM reasoning is not of a low level in all game settings; rather, individuals may display effective TOM reasoning, reflecting realistic assumptions about their opponents, in competitive and relatively simple games. Copyright (C) 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据