4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Location is everything: The hemodynamic effects of REBOA in Zone 1 versus Zone 3 of the aorta

期刊

JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY
卷 85, 期 1, 页码 101-107

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001858

关键词

Endovascular; intra-aortic balloon; resuscitation; shock

资金

  1. Clinical Investigation Facility, David Grant USAF Medical Center, Travis Air Force Base, California

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) is an emerging technology to augment proximal blood pressure during the resuscitation of patients with noncompressible torso hemorrhage. Currently, placement choice, supraceliac (Zone 1) versus infrarenal (Zone 3) aorta, depends on injury patterns, but remains a highly debated topic. We sought to compare the proximal hemodynamic support provided by Zone 1 versus Zone 3 REBOA placement and the degree of hemodynamic instability upon reperfusion following intervention. METHODS Eighteen anesthetized swine underwent controlled hemorrhage of 25% total blood volume, followed by 45 minutes of Zone 1 REBOA, Zone 3 REBOA, or no intervention (control). They were then resuscitated with shed blood, aortic balloons were deflated, and 5 hours of critical care ensued prior to euthanasia. Physiologic parameters were recorded continuously, and blood was drawn for analysis at specified intervals. Significance was defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS There were no significant differences between groups at baseline or during the initial 30 minutes of hemorrhage. During the intervention period, average proximal MAP was significantly greater in Zone 1 animals when compared with Zone 3 animals (127.9 1.3 vs. 53.4 +/- 1.1 mm Hg) and greater in Zone 3 animals when compared with control animals (42.9 +/- 0.9 mm Hg). Lactate concentrations were significantly higher in Zone 1 animals (9.6 +/- 0.4 mmol/L) when compared with Zone 3 animals (5.1 +/- 0.3 mmol/L) and control animals (4.2 +/- 0.8 mmol/L). CONCLUSIONS In our swine model of hemorrhagic shock, Zone 3 REBOA provided minimal proximal hemodynamic support when compared with Zone 1 REBOA, albeit with less ischemic burden and instability upon reperfusion. In cases of impending hemodynamic collapse, Zone 1 REBOA placement may be more efficacious regardless of injury pattern, whereas Zone 3 should be reserved only for relatively stable patients with ongoing distal hemorrhage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据