4.2 Article

Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Study of Chlorite Minerals

期刊

JOURNAL OF SPECTROSCOPY
卷 2018, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2018/6958260

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [41502312]
  2. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2015BAB05B0301]
  3. China Geological Survey Foundation [DD20160002]
  4. Fundamental Research Grant Scheme of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [41502312]
  5. Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology [2015BAB05B0301]
  6. China Geological Survey Foundation [DD20160002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mineral chemistry of twenty chlorite samples from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) spectral library and two other regions, having a wide range of Fe and Mg contents and relatively constant Al and Si contents, was studied via infrared (IR) spectroscopy, near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy, and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis. Five absorption features of the twenty samples near 4525, 4440, 4361, 4270, and 4182 cm(-1) were observed, and two diagnostic features at 4440 and 4280 cm-1 were recognized. Assignments of the two diagnostic features were made for two combination bands ((nu + delta)((AlAl)O-OH) and (nu + delta)((SiAl)O-OH)) by regression with IR fundamental absorptions. Furthermore, the determinant factors of the NIR band position were found by comparing the band positions with relative components. The results showed that Fe/(Fe + Mg) values are negatively correlated with the two NIR combination bands. The findings provide an interpretation of the NIR band formation and demonstrate a simple way to use NIR spectroscopy to discriminate between chlorites with different components. More importantly, spectroscopic detection of mineral chemical variations in chlorites provides geologists with a tool with which to collect information on hydrothermal alteration zones from hyperspectral-resolution remote sensing data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据