4.6 Article

Phenylquinoline fused cyclic derivatives as electron acceptors of exciplex forming hosts for solution-processable red phosphorescent OLEDs

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 6, 期 30, 页码 8035-8041

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8tc02757a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61575146, 61405069, 11504168]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0404500]
  3. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2015CB932200]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [2017CFB687]
  5. Nanjing Tech University (NJTech) & AAC Technologies collaborated funds [20161117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skeletons of phenylquinoline fused cyclic derivatives for electron accepting materials are synthesized and their thermal, electrochemical, photophysical and device optoelectronic properties are fully characterized. Density functional theory simulations coincide with the experimental results, which reveal the core role of the phenylquinolinyl moiety in both intra- and inter-molecular electronic transitions. Due to the high electron accepting capability of the quinolinyl moiety, blends of these compounds with the llectron donor material 4,4',4 ''-tris(N-3-methylphenyl-N-phenyLamino)triphenylamine form efficient exciplex hosts. Through the utilization of the exciplex hosts, simplified phosphorescent emitting devices with bis(2-phenylquinolinato)(2,4-pentanedionato)iridium [Ir(PQ)(2)acac] are constructed by the solution process. All of the devices exhibit a high performance ascribed to an efficient energy transfer and balanced charge carriers in the emission zone. External quantum efficiencies of the devices of up to a maximum of 14.1% are achieved and maintain a high level of 9.6-12.2% at 1000 cd m(-2) and 6.5-8.2% at 10 000 cd m(-2), respectively. The excellent performance of the device with the newly designed acceptor materials is in the top level of Ir(PQ)(2)acac based phosphorescent devices fabricated by the solution process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据