期刊
POLITICAL THEORY
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 32-57出版社
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0090591711426854
关键词
Habermas; civil disobedience; agonistic democracy; consensus; aesthetic-expressive action
Habermas's paradigm of communicative action is usually taken to be pretty much dominated by consensus, Yes-saying. What if this were a radically one-sided perception? We take up this unorthodox position by arguing that no-saying in this paradigm is typically overlooked and underemphasized. To demonstrate this, we consider how negativity is figured at the most basic onto-ethical level in communicative action, as well as expressed in civil disobedience, a phenomenon to which Habermas assigns the remarkable role of touchstone (Prufstein) of constitutional democracy. Once the importance of no-saying is drawn out, the paradigm looks distinctly less hostile to dissensus and agonism in democratic life.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据