4.6 Article

Intriguing electronic insensitivity and high carrier mobility in monolayer hexagonal YN

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 6, 期 18, 页码 4943-4951

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8tc00558c

关键词

-

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Advanced Power Transmission Technology [GEIRI-SKL-2017-013]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61405238, 51706029]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [2014GXNSFCB118004]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [106112017CDJQJ128836]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional (2D) materials have extraordinary properties and multifunctional applications; thus, prodigious efforts have been made in the exploration of novel 2D materials. In this study, 2D hexagonal YN (h-YN) is predicted based on theoretical calculations. By assessing its phonon spectrum, ab initio molecular dynamics and elastic constants, the h-YN monolayer is proven to exhibit satisfying thermal, dynamic and mechanical stability. Unique from most of the reported 2D transition metal mononitrides, which exhibit metallic characteristics, monolayer h-YN is a semiconductor with an indirect bandgap of 2.322 eV. In particular, the electronic structures of h-YN present unusually insensitive responses to tensile or compressive strain due to valence orbital hybridization. Carrier mobility calculations suggest that monolayer h-YN possesses a high electron mobility of up to 10(4) cm(2) V-1 s(-1) and hole mobility of up to 10(3) cm(2) V-1 s(-1) in the zigzag and armchair orientations. Moreover, few-layer h-YN displays evident semiconductor performances and dispersive conductive bands, indicating light electron effective masses and excellent electron transport capabilities. This pronounced carrier mobility, insensitive electronic responses to strain and light electron effective masses of its few-layer structures demonstrate that h-YN is a promising candidate in future nanoscale electronic devices in high-strain conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据